Jean B

Toi et moi avons ce point en commun, beurk !☹️

Bonsoir, Voilà mes réponses : James has been talking to his wife for five minutes. Their son has damaged their car. James left to work early this morning but I think that he doesn’t want to come back home/go home. C'est un sans faute, bravo ! ?

Bonsoir, I – COMPREHENSION CHECK 5/ The people on the pictures are Japanese beacause one of them has his head bowed, which is the way they greet. In America, you should eat your hamburger with both hands. II – DISCUSSION ...............................and do what French people call la bise ....................... Il me semble bien t'avoir déjà posé la question : ne te relis-tu pas ? Si tu réponds négativement, prends donc l'habitude de le faire car personne ne le fera à ta place le jour J.

Bonsoir, I'm crazy about burgers. Good job! ?

https://www.mosalingua.com/blog/2018/06/27/comment-comprendre-l-anglais/ https://www.anglaisfacile.com/cours_anglais/comprendre-l-anglais-oral https://www.astuces-economies.fr/2012/10/23/produits-gratuits/services-en-ligne/10-sites-pour-apprendre-langlais-oral-gratuitement/ https://www.letudiant.fr/examen/tests-examens-langues/l-anglais-facile-5-cours-pour-progresser-a-l-oral/cours-d-anglais-1-ameliorer-sa-comprehension-orale.html Ta dernière demande sur le site remontant au 9 novembre dernier, je te pose cette question : qu'as-tu fait depuis cette date pour remédier à tes lacunes ?

Bonjour, En fin de classe terminale, ton S.O.S. arrive bien tard en effet et je ne vois pas comment je pourrais t'aider à distance ! ☹️ Mais si tu t'en donnes les moyens, tu peux encore "sauver les meubles". Passe-toi en boucle les chansons anglophones que tu préfères, les enregistrements si tu en as, les vidéos et films accessibles sur le Web, les sources sonores ne manquent pas. Ci-dessous, tu trouveras 3 liens vers de telles sources ainsi que des aides. https://www.qwant.com/?q=compréhension de l'anglais oral&t=web https://www.anglaisfacile.com/cours_anglais/apprendre-anglais-oral https://www.anglaisfacile.com/exercices/exercice-anglais-2/exercice-anglais-1936.php Bon courage.

Bonjour Alex, À l'avenir, sache que pour poster une demande d'aide sur le forum, il ne faut jamais poster à la suite d'un sujet ancien. Au contraire, il faut utiliser le bouton vert en haut de la page à droite et lui donner un titre original évocateur de son contenu. Exceptionnellement cette fois, tu trouveras ci-dessous tes deux textes corrigés et annotés. En conséquence, j'ai supprimé ton post parasite dans le sujet "Correction texte" ouvert par coco17170 le 12 février 2017. Bonsoir, J'ai rédigé deux textes sur la PMA en anglais. Pouvez-vous corriger mes fautes SVP ? Merci!! Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is a medical procedures. This techniques address deals with infertility: vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cryopreservation of gametes or embryos, and/or the use of fertility medication. Bioethics laws provide a framework for ATM around the world. The Bioethics is the study of what is right or wrong in new discoveries and advances in biology and medicine, genetic technologies. For example: drug research, genetic engineering and the transplantation of organs. The Nazis have achieved experience on the humans, like the Jews. The Bioethics is was born in the 1970's. New social policies have were adopted the such as birth control, the right of to abortion. The Bioethics growth grew with the law in the 1970s. The Scientifics questions are became socials questions. A lot of litigations are were born, over 17 million civil actions per year. Rules of law are emerged to protect the people, the patients. The consent by patient must be mandatory, according to Canterbury v. Spence in 1972. If a mentally ill people person can affect a peoples someone’s life, the professional confidentiality can be broken, according to Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. The law has provided a framework for research in the field of bioethics. There are far more law schools who that work in the bioethics field, over 200. There are several techniques to have children, thanks to ART. In 25th July 1978, Louise Brown was the first birth of a child to be born after IVF treatment in England. the research fertilize eggs and Ovums are fertilized with spermatozoon in the laboratory. In 1994 baby Audrey was born the baby, after IVF treatment in England. The first birth by ICSI took place on 14th January 1992. In 1998, Tommy was born the first test-tube baby. In 2009, 3.4 million children have been were born worldwide after ART treatment. In 2020, French senators examine the draft law on bioethics, including the issue of access to LDCs for all women. =================================================================== What are the legal bioethics issues raised by ART? First the ART is a problem raised in lots of countries of in the world. The ART is a right. Many Americans do not have insurance coverage for fertility treatments, that is to benefit a have/enjoy Art. Many states are starting to mandate coverage. The americans With a complete coverage, Americans use more the ART techniques. There are some health insurance companies that cover diagnosis of infertility, but not treaments costs. The costs is relatively high and depends on practices. The practices with a higher chance of success are necessarily more expensive. So, the lowest price is 650 dollars and the FIV technique costs 39 000 dollars. In the United Kingdom, all patients have the right to preliminary free of charge testing by the National Health Service. However, the people who to want acces to treatment These person must register on a waiting list. Many patients therefore pay to be care treated in private clinics. According to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, in 2015 in Europe, 157,500 children were born thanks to th ART. The bioethics questions on ART are prerogative of E. U members states. Each Member State has its own legislation. For example, Spain and France open Art to all womens. Spain established this right in 1977. In France in 2019, the Senate voted LDC for all womens, for single women and lesbian couples, but not reimbursement for all womans. The Croatia authorizes ART for single women and Austria authorizes only for lesbian couples. ART is a technology that has treated millions of infertile couples the world over. However, this technology has introduced new legal problem. The art ART forces legal systems to modify laws to accommodate the challenges created by ART it. Difficulties in single-parent environments are present as much for women as for children: financial and educational difficulties. Women are entitled to social assistance and this costs the State. Precariousness is therefore created. The law legally deprives children of a father and this is contrary to the international convention on the child. It's difficult to live without a father. Surrogacy is forbidden in spite of social problems, measures have been taken to protect the patient. A law requires clinics in the United States to report information regarding ART. Such laws were implemented so that patients may be informed as to which hospitals are have good results. Laws result in couples traveling across border to obtain treatments that are forbidden in their native country. his Its name is cross-border reproductive care, this practice represents 10% of the total ART cycles performed worldwide. To conclude ART is a successful medical technology. This technique gives to hope to millions of couples suffering from infertility. However, ART also has presented new ethical, legal and social questions. Lots of countries have taken steps to regulate the ART. The ethical and legal questions that exist surrounding ART remains an issue. The solution is to increase access to care to citizens. Due to the rapidly evolving nature of the ART, legislation is often late. Governments therefore have a role to play in making ART accessible to all. Why not generalise the reimbursement of ART? J’espère que tu as conscience de tes énormes lacunes de grammaire : - emploi et omission du déterminant “the” - particularités de l’adjectif épithète - emploi des temps passé/présent - règles d’emploi des majuscules aux noms propres et aux sigles Sans plus tarder, tu as intérêt à revoir cela en détail et en profondeur.

Bonsoir Raphaël, En pièce jointe tu trouveras ton texte corrigé dans lequel j'ai supprimé les répétitions incriminées. Si tu ne disposes d'aucun dictionnaire, en voici un -multilingue- consultable librement en ligne. https://www.wordreference.com/enfr/ Correction_Myths and heroes.docx

Bonjour, Cartoon of by Mike Luckovich 1) This document is a cartoon which was drawn by Mike Luckovich and published on December 18, 2013. It is not entitled but it shows the viewers the role of the NSA, the National Security Agency, which tries to protect the Americans. However, she < Aurais-tu donc oublié qu’il y a 3 genres en anglais ? > it doesn't just do that, she it also spies on the American society. What is the NSA actually monitoring? Why does the NSA monitor the USA so much? 2) In this cartoon, we find several information. We can see a room where we find a man sitting at a desk on which two computers are placed. On these computers one can observe the messages "Americans Personal Data" and "Phone records" which are probably information concerning the USA. Then above the desk we can see a satellite dish. In addition, this man who sits with an angry look as we can see by the expression on his face expresses his dissatisfaction with the phrase "Stop violating my privacy !!!" to a dog who < Si le chien est bien l’antécédent > which plays Edward Snowden. Snowden is an NSA whistleblower who has not respected the agency's confidentiality. Through this caricature, we can deduce that Snowden to delivered information on the agency that were to remain private such as for example the fact that the NSA not only protects the Americans but also spies on them. For this, she it listens to telephone conversations, infiltrates computers using software and programs in order to gather enough information. This cartoon is affirming, through a message, that Americans cannot trust government authority because their smallest act and gesture is < Le sujet est pluriel > are monitored by the NSA. 3) The cartoonist's intentions are quite clear. For several years, the USA has held various organizations which are responsible for monitoring the country and alerting the government to all the potential dangers threatening them. However, the NSA's heightened surveillance of the Americans is rather dubious, as one can think from Mike Luckovich's point of view, that the agency even doubts the Americans and perhaps considers them as a potential threat. The cartoonist's then reveals through his drawing what the NSA really does behind his < Décidément… ! > its image of protector and the one who made it possible to discover this: Edward Snowden. Through the sentence spoken by the man, the author allows us to understand that Snowden is in danger because of the leak of information concerning the agency. Luckovich wants to show that Snowden has apparently broken some sort of confidentiality with the NSA and has shown that today American citizens no longer have to do government authority to act. The cartoonist is attempting to change the image of the NSA seen by the Americans and make them understand that they are constantly observed by it. 4) In my mind, this cartoon denounces and criticizes the acts carried out by the NSA for several years behind the backs of Americans by hiding the truth from them. The picture shows that the American government is lying about the extent of what it does. While the NSA is responsible for protecting citizens from attacks by expanding their security and espionage powers by monitoring the world, it unfortunately considers others to be a potential danger and does all of this illegally. For/To me this cartoon is a good thing because it shows the United States citizens that they must be careful and that they should no longer trust this type of agency. Malgré la petite bévue signalée au début, ton anglais est excellent et ton analyse pointue à tel point que j’ai presque pu « voir » la caricature. Bravo ! ?

Bonjour Raphaël, Quand tu m'auras un peu "pratiqué", tu sauras que je n'interviens jamais sur le fond car la forme suffit amplement à mon bonheur. ? Ceci dit, tu manies et écris l'anglais de manière quasi impeccable. ? Bonne chance pour ton oral. Relecture.docx

Bonsoir Julien, bienvenue sur le forum.

Bonsoir, Repasse-toi la vidéo autant de fois qu'il faudra jusqu'à ce que le déclic se produise et il se produira. Voici un peu d'aide pour te lancer. 3. 4 years of his life 4. Do you use social media? 5. Yes 6. Yes À toi le reste, bonne chance.

Merci beaucoup d'avoir clarifié les choses comme tu l'as fait, j'apprécie. ? Si tu continues à fréquenter notre forum, ce que je souhaite, tu constateras vite que j'ai quelques bonnes raisons d'être parfois exaspéré par le "je-m'en-foutisme" de certains demandeurs.

Bonjour, Tu trouveras ci-dessous les seules phrases qui posaient problème. EXERCICE 1 : Proposez des énoncés à la voix active. Réintroduisez un agent quand c'est possible 1/ The proposed spacecraft would be so large it might have to be sent to Earth orbit in two launches in 2015. → The proposed spacecraft would be so large that they might have to send it to Earth orbit in two launches in 2015. < Qui sont « they » ? Ne peux-tu pas employer un nom tel que engineers ou technicians ? 3/ Our Newsletter is being read in Iran. → They're Iranians/Iranian people/ are reading our Newsletter in Iran. < Le nom sujet était quand même évident à trouver là, non ? 4/ His calligraphy had been highly esteemed throughout Chinese history. → Palaeographers had highly esteemed his calligraphy throughout Chinese history. < Tu auras sans doute remarqué qu'étant de la vieille école, je privilégie le sujet nom toutes les fois que c'est possible. Je pense avoir d'autant plus raison que l'énoncé te demande de réintroduire un agent quand c'est possible. EXERCICE 2 : Réécrire au passif 7/ My hormones made me do it. → It was done because of my hormones ???? I was made to do it by my hormones. 9/ It is best to visit this place at night. → This place is best to be visited at night < Étais-tu fatigué ? EXERCICE 3 : Traduisez en utilisant le passif 4/ On ne sait pas à qui profitera le crime. → We don't know who will be benefited from the crime. Who will benefit from the crime is unknown. 7/ On donna aux secrétaires une augmentation. → The secretaries salary was raised. >The secretaries were given a pay rise. < Je préfère ! ? Bonne continuation.

Bonjour, Question d'un aidant légèrement exaspéré : à quoi bon poser une question si tu ne reviens pas prendre connaissance de la réponse en temps utile ? Suppression des sujets non suivis

Bonsoir Baptiste, bienvenue sur e-bahut, Le moins que je puisse te dire, c'est que tu n'es guère prévoyant. De plus, tu n'es guère généreux sur le contexte. Quoi qu'il en soit voici une traduction possible qui t'aidera, je l'espère. => Me confronter à l'injustice mondiale comme me l'ont proposé des inconnus dans l'espoir d'obtenir un visa pour les États-Unis fut pour moi beaucoup plus révélateur qu'un voyage d'agrément avec un nouveau petit ami. Faute de contexte suffisant mais sachant que "propose" signifie également "faire une demande en mariage", la phrase pourrait également se traduire ainsi : =>>> Me confronter à l'injustice mondiale comme/alors que/ des inconnus m'ont proposé le mariage dans l'espoir d'obtenir un visa pour les États-Unis fut pour moi beaucoup plus révélateur qu'un voyage d'agrément avec un nouveau petit ami.

Bonjour, Ignorerais-tu comment faire quelques petites recherches avec ton ordinateur ? ? Exemple : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Quai_de_Ouistreham_(récit) Cela m'a pris moins de 1 minute ! ?

Bonjour Maël, Bonjour. Pouvez-vous s'il vous plaît me corriger mon texte ? Merci Think of some famous eccentrics. What makes them unconventional? First of all, In my opinion what makes eccentrics people eccentric (1) are is (2) first of all their originality and their creativity. Unlike with a conventional person, an (3) odd person one (4) wears unusual clothes. For example, an extravagant man wears old-fashion items, looks gothic or dresses (5) like/as a woman. Moreover, she he has a hairstyle. A classic person has brown, blond, red or grey hair whereas a quirky person has pink or red hair. Next, I think the reason why a person is weird is because he/she (6) behaves/they behave in a strange way. That is to say, she tries they try unconventional things such as dangerous experiences. She They often has have a bizarre sense of humour and sometimes she seems a little bit arrogant. Finally, to my mind being eccentric doesn't mean you are mad. You are just unique and different of from the others. The British are well-known for being eccentrics contrary to the French who are more classical. Thank you so much. (1) Attention, eccentric est à la fois nom et adjectif. Ici il est adjectif, donc INVARIABLE. (2) Le sujet de be est what = singulier = is. (3) an devant un nom commençant par une voyelle ou un h aspiré. (4) le pronom one pour éviter la répétition du nom person. (5) La 3ème personne singulier du présent d'un verbe en -ss se fait en y ajoutant -es. Idem pour le pluriel des noms en -ss. (6) Attention, person a les 2 genres en anglais, i.e. masculin ET féminin. Le pronom pluriel permet d'éviter la difficulté puisqu'il s'applique aux 2 genres.

Bonjour, Bien que je ne sois pas spécialiste du français, tu trouveras des informations utiles ICI. Avec mes encouragements. ?

Merci pour le texte support, je persiste et je signe.

Bonjour, Dans le titre, une première faute (que j'ai corrigée) dont il faut vite te débarrasser et bien mémoriser la règle : - construction du présent simple interrogatif : do/does + sujet + base verbale Autrement dit, c'est l'auxiliaire do qui marque le temps et la personne du sujet. Ici does puisque le sujet est une 3ème personne singulier, le verbe reste à l'infinitif/base verbale. > What does it mean? He It tastes like hot, milky, leafy water (pour parler du thé anglais) To taste like = avoir le goût de <OK hot = épice < C'est tout simplement l'adjectif qualificatif appliqué au nom water = chaude milky = laiteux/laiteuse leafy water = goût Mot à mot > eau de feuilles Ne connaissant pas le contexte, il faut tenter de trouver un substitutif, de préférence ironique, j'assume. Je te propose "lavasse" > Il vous a un goût de lavasse de lait chaude. ainsi que le verbe to procrastinate from On a le même verbe transitif direct en français > procrastiner = différer/remettre au lendemain. Mais j'avoue ne pas comprendre pourquoi l'auteur a modifié ce verbe transitif direct en indirect. Ne connaissant pas le contexte, je prendrai le risque de traduire par > J'ai besoin de thé pour attendre de/me mettre au travail/travailler. À tes risques et périls donc, te voilà prévenu. Si tu n'es toujours pas équipé d'un dictionnaire bilingue, je te rappelle celui-ci consultable en ligne gratuitement : https://www.wordreference.com/fr/

Thank you ever so much Maël for your good wishes, you made my day. I wish you the best in turn for the next year, particularly at school. Happy New Year! JRB

Non, pas du tout. Pour faire simple : - la Grande Bretagne est une île, terme de géographie, la plus grande des îles britanniques, qui comprend essentiellement l'Angleterre, le Pays de Galles et l'Écosse. - le Royaume Uni est un état, terme de politique, qui regroupe les 3 pays mentionnés ci-dessus plus l'Irlande du Nord.

Bonjour, Tu as une bonne maîtrise de l'anglais, tu devrais donc porter tes efforts sur le fond.

Bonjour, Introduction: I'm going to talk about the notion "The idea of progress" which consists in making us believe that the world can become better in several areas and that it has shaped most of our vision of the history of western civilization . Progress consists of changes that represent evolution. This evolution has been accentuated in recent years in technology, social life, science, etc. <Ton énumération commençant par un nom, il fallait la continuer par des noms. However, such developments raise questions about the possible consequences on the future as well as the excesses of the today’s consumer society of today. Here we will focus on the evolution of eugenics and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. To argue the definition of the concept, I will use the following documents: Clones r us, Design babies, China's two child policy, My sister's keeper by Nick Cassavetes, Britain says yes to 3 parent babies, Globe online (text A), Today (text B). At first we will see the positive aspect of the selective creation of children then in a second time part we will observe the negative aspect of this creation What are the positive and negative effects of scientific progress? What are the positive and negative effects of the evolution of eugenics and preimplantation genetic diagnosis? For years, we have hoped that one day we will be able to save the world from the death that threatens every person every day to finally die in peace, quietly. For this, some doctors have started this process by inventing the "PGD" which consists in eliminating almost all the diseases transmitted genetically from parents to children. This procedure makes it possible to detect the sick embryo before it is fertilized and to choose one that has no chance of carrying a disease. In text A of CHS Globe Online published in 2010, the article written informs us that using the "PGD" procedure scientists can now accurately predict certain genetic diseases in potential embryos, ensuring that the disease chosen embryo <Je suppose is healthy. It is a chance for the people to save the world. This process is scientific progress. Nevertheless, "PGD" is a revolutionary technique which is explained in different ways such as through texts, reports or even in articles. For example, in the report entitled "Designer babies", a journalist explains to us that thanks to the "PGD", Dr. Steinberg will also help Designer babies: thanks to Dr. Steinberg <N’aurais-tu rien sauté en recopiant ?> and the "PGD" couples can choose an embryo which n has no trace of communicable genetic diseases Just like the article "Britain says yes to 3-parent babies" in which it is said that to stop the transmission of diseases from a mother to her newborn. The first one who could benefit from this could be born from the DNA of three different people. This technique will help families with mitochondrial diseases. However, this would open the door to the genetic modification of children and "designer babies". In addition, the "PGD" is not used that way there. In the film "My sister keeper", a doctor suggested/proposed to a family to make a third child who would be identical to their seriously ill daughter, Kate, in order to save her. So the parents decided to create Anna in order to heal her sister. Finally, another family is in the same situation as the one in the film. Molly's family in the article published in "Today" in 2010 decided to have a new baby in order to save their seriously ill daughter. Her only chance was to be saved by someone compatible with her. Only the only person who can save her is a genetically compatible brother or sister. For this, doctors used the "PGD" procedure and gave birth to their second child, Adam, who then became the first case of the embryo chosen. The evolution of scientific progress towards methods making it possible to cure or stop the transmission of diseases develops <Sauf erreur, le groupe sujet « The evolution of scientific progress » est un singulier from year to year then advancing towards the possibility of a perfect future. However, this procedure or eugenics have has not only positive sides but also have harmful, negative aspects. While the "PGD" procedure allows couples to have children who are not likely to be carriers of diseases, it has evolved over time to be able to accept parents to be able to choose the characteristics of their baby. (color of eyes, hair, ...) as in text A. At the beginning a person chosen as at the market chose the physical and psychological qualities of his child as if he were at the market. So in by wanting to save babies, the "PGD" has bad, destructive consequences for the world and especially for the children themselves. Just like in the "Designer babies" report. Couples will soon have the possibility of choosing certain characteristics of their future baby to satisfy their desires to obtain a baby as they have always wanted to have thanks to the "PGD". While Dr. Steinberg sees this favorably, Dr. Caplan notes the dangers and selfishness in this procedure. The "PGD" has bad intentions. In the film "My sister's keeper" as well as in text B: a child was specially created to save the other child from the seriously ill couple using the "PGD" procedure. Unfortunately, even if it is for a good reason, this procedure has a negative effect on families because this choice has its share of selfishness. Their second child was not wanted for natural reasons but for reasons that seem to be right when at bottom they are unhealthy in fact. Only, when these babies are aware of their choices, they will be able to choose whether or not they want to have an operation. We can therefore say that the "PGD" scientific progress which does not necessarily have good consequences. Developments in the world come in different forms and are not for the well-being of people but to respect the desires of society as in the report "China's two child policy". Society has forced Chinese couples to have the right to have a maximum of two children (a girl and a boy). The advantage, in this case, is to succeed in reducing the Chinese population but also because the population is old. However, the downside is that if couples have more than two children, they will have to make a choice, such as an abortion, in order to succeed in not breaking the norm imposed by society. This is part of eugenics which demonstrates that it is a collective result in a society where the search for "the perfect child" would take precedence. This example also refers to the caricature "Clones r us" in which we can deduce that society expresses its wish to see people who are all alike and who enter into the mores. They do not want a person to stand out by being original so as not to be rejected by others. But this caricature is a kind of threat to make people understand that they must be listened to so that society does not put them aside. Using these examples we have been able to see that this evolution as well as eugenics are part of history which have good and bad consequences on the future. In conclusion, I have just studied 7 documents demonstrating the effects of the evolution of scientific progress constituting the notion "The idea of progress". Indeed, in my first part we have seen that the evolution of eugenics as well as the creation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis on have both positive and negative sides. These advances have made it possible not to be rejected by society but also to completely stop the transmission of genetic and fatal diseases. Through these examples we have seen that we hope that one day we can eradicate all communicable diseases and save a lot of people. In my second part however, we saw that the development of certain techniques as well as eugenics also has negative aspects which can become harmful for the people concerned by this and the world around them. Some people are used to save diseases, parents abuse the misuse "PGD" to satisfy their wish or even to prohibit the creation of a number of children to respect the desire of society to save their world. These two aspects demonstrate the underside of scientific progress and that even if there are positive effects, there are inevitably harmful consequences due to the development of selective creation of children. Même remarque que précédemment : tu abuses des phrases à rallonge, ce qui alourdit le style et crée le risque d’interprétations erronées.